tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7327679700248343354.post1922795319999526399..comments2023-05-21T08:25:42.474-04:00Comments on Life as a Lutho-Anglican...: Theological RevolutionJ.L.http://www.blogger.com/profile/13978510948065137234noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7327679700248343354.post-41658894294973713372012-04-01T14:55:15.865-04:002012-04-01T14:55:15.865-04:00I'm not sure about the first generation, but I...I'm not sure about the first generation, but I feel like Hooker was that way. i just read a biography about him and the reason that he was never considered for consecration as bishop was because of his "Roman" sentiments. He, of course had some significant reformed/calvinistic leanings, but he was fiercely opposed to much Calvinistic exposition and showmanship (which it apparentlyJ.L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/13978510948065137234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7327679700248343354.post-69927391149849187882012-04-01T14:13:43.957-04:002012-04-01T14:13:43.957-04:00Terrific post. I don't believe that the refor...Terrific post. I don't believe that the reformed Church of Cranmer, Latimer, Hooker, et. al. was ever self-consciously a <i>via media</i>, but rather encompassed, as you say, "a theology that strives to reflect the best of the first five centuries and that takes seriously the Church Fathers."Chuck Hickshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01929470338280066656noreply@blogger.com